Back

Introduction to Workplace Investigations: Purpose and Importance

This one aspect of HR can be a highly sensitive but important procedure in any workplace: Workplace investigations. Investigations have a few clear definite agendas to uncover truths, resolve the problems and keep the business and people from any danger, such as physical, reputational or work environment related. Imagine it like a virus detection software, and the virus being the problem which can destabilize or even malfunction your organization.

When any kind of investigation is taken on with the intent of finding the culprit, problem or issue and then resolving it using fairness and disciplinary rules, it increases the trust that employees or partners have in the company.

In today’s ever-evolving workplaces, where remote work, global hiring and transnational cultural boundaries have to be respected, it is important that a clear internal investigation framework is in place. Corporations are expected to have such systems in place where each employee on every level can feel that they can raise any issue related to harassment, violations, frauds, misconduct or discrimination with a clear set of guidelines. If any investigation is not carried out properly it can be highly damaging to the business and morale of the employees and can set a dangerous precedent for future events. And worse of all: Legal Risk. A minor issue of a few thousand dollars can bring in suits that can range technically in millions of dollars.

At the same time, if workplace investigations are carried out properly and honestly, it can empower the entire organization from top to bottom. It could simply mean that even a CEO will be afraid of a clerical staff if she tries to conduct dishonesty or even a small act of verbal harassment. Conclusively, workplace investigations can be viewed as a powerful internal tool for organizations to keep a check on every employee who even intends some sort of personal or professional harm.

Workplace investigation policy should be integrated into a company’s governance and policy structure manual that if any case arises, the wheels should start turning reflexively.

Types of Investigations: Internal vs. HR vs. Workplace Contexts

The key thing here to understand is that all of these three Internal investigations, HR investigations or workplace investigations may sound the same but there are key differences in each, they involve different stakeholders and can require a different method and approach.

Internal inquiries focus in most cases on the operational and business workings of an organization. These normally include things associated with money: Frauds, financial discrepancies such as embezzlements or schemes, data theft and data security. These type of investigations are usually headed by leaders or compliance departments and can involve various legal and regulatory bodies.

Whereas, HR investigation concentrates largely on issues pertaining to workforce. Here the key issues handled may look like: harassment and employment discrimination, bullying or breaking disciplinary policies and workplace conduct. HR departments are vital in these areas and usually take the lead in these matters, following a strict policy guideline which outlines procedural and disciplinary guidelines. Normally HR departments also hold policy communication sessions early during on boarding as well.

Workplace investigations is in itself a broad term that normally covers the spectrum of internal and HR inquiries. This means that investigations are conducted in a professional setting to address a complaint or to find out if accusations are true. In workplace investigations everything is covered from a small cat call to larger issues like public fraud or funds embezzlement.

When you are to distinguish between these investigation types, you can set towards a clear cut road map of addressing the issues at hand.

Common Triggers for an Internal or HR Investigation

A proactive approach to investigations is the best strategy. In a myriad of cases, there were subtle signatures and signs of misconduct or misappropriations that should not be ignored. To avoid risk and intervention it is important to read these signs early and address them.

The best way to make sure you are not caught blindsided is to never ignore complains in minor conversations. Any sort of conversation, even held at the coffee station or lunch room that involves themes of harassment or an employee complaining about discrimination, unfair treatment should not go unnoticed.

In structured organizations normally a whistleblower report warrants an investigation. However, employees can also approach HR relating to wrongful business practices, financial frauds or breach of company codes and policies. Whistleblowers have a lot of immunity now and organizations are expected to act quickly if someone blows the whistle.
Performance issues, absenteeism, attitude and behavioral changes with regards to chain of command can signal a major issue with regards to internal conflict or team concerns.

At the same time, when audits and compliance teams conduct reviews they discover discrepancies related to financial data, system data and business practices. Sometimes, customers’ complaints and legal notices can initiate workplace investigations. The objective should always be to uncover the truth without making any assumption or saving a key employee or a vendor.

The most intricate part of workplace investigations is that they operate in a mix of legal and organizational policy framework. Companies have to be very careful while treading these waters to ensure that they do not disturb any of the sensitive issues like employment laws, compliance and regulatory issues and at the same time conclude the investigations with all transparency.

Ensuring that labor laws and state laws regarding employment and discrimination are not ruffled. Negligence by HR in this area can result in a backfiring of legal suits relating to wrongful termination, negligence of employers etc. Not only this, most of the states now require companies to properly conduct and document investigations pertaining to issues like sexual harassment and workplace safety.

A key element around which investigations revolve are the confidentiality of all parties involved until the conclusion and hard evidence of wrong doing. But this should be bundled with conducting a transparent investigation while ensuring accountability.

Some ingredients vital to a positive outcome from a workplace investigation are: all parties should be given ample time for hearing their side, any factors which create biasness should be removed early on, evidence should be the main thing on which the outcome should hinge, no matter how dear or resented any of the party involved it. The investigation should be totally impartial.

Another key aspect is the documentation of every meeting, chain of events and any evidence found along the way. This ensures that you have a sound legal argument and solid proof if things get out of hand and you are referred to the public courts. This protects the organization in case there is any legal scrutiny.

Roles and Responsibilities: HR, Management, and Investigators

Before the beginning of any successful investigation, it is crucial that all the players or administrators know the extent of their roles and authority. If this is unclear there is a chance of stepping over other people’s shoes and crossing boundaries.

The central figure in all of the workplace related investigations is the HR. However, it acts as the main point of referral for all types of complaints and arbitrations. Not only this, but HR is also responsible for transparent communications throughout the investigations and to ensure confidentiality is maintained.

Management plays a vital role as well, however more often than not, they are the one who the investigation is going on about. So it is important that they do not influence the proceedings, rather they should be involved as the ones taking the decisions and the ones who shoulder the burden of the proceedings. HR should be only their yardstick.

Investigators can be any set of people nominated by the management involving HR as well, sometimes there are external investigators as well, they should interview, gather evidence and ensure they remain focused on bringing the facts to light.

In some cases, the organization may voluntarily involve legal counsel and consultants. This happens if the case is sensitive or any executive member is being investigated. Defining the roles of each party during the investigation process streamlines the work and ensures that the outcome is credible.

Planning the Investigation: Scope, Objectives, and Strategy

When any issue or complaint is brought to light, instead of jumping head first and creating a hostile work environment for the one accused, it is important to chart out a roadmap of how to conduct the investigation. After hearing the complaint, the first step should be to define the scope of the investigation. A clear scope will define the parties involved, and the allegations so that your investigation does not lose sight of its objective.

After that, objectives have to be ascertained. Does the outcome involve disciplinary action, corrective or preventive actions? And in some cases legal proceedings. A clear objective will guide the workplace investigation process in a structured manner.

Strategy is essential to the entire process. You have to plan out meetings, gather evidence, or meet witnesses, and finally document all the evidence, witnesses and chain of events. Sometimes it requires that some parties may be placed on leave or employment suspension.

During this entire process, HR should determine the delicacy of the investigation and ensure that it does not bring the business or the company into disrepute by taking any harsh or immediate decision. If there is a need, it is always best to have a legal opinion in every step of the way.

Evidence Collection: Interviews, Documentation, and Digital Records

Foremost, it is important to gather evidence. A case where there is no evidence can become highly intricate to execute. Interviewing all parties involved separately and if need be together on a later date to ensure that none of the parties is lying or exaggerating facts.

Whilst this is going on, documentation should be on point. Ensuring all points of meetings are logged and signed by the attendees, and any official documents like emails, performance records, transactions and anything legible is attached. These things go a long way if people start changing minds, or retract their statements.

Evidence, especially in this digital age is easily altered, it is imperative to create a copy of all possible sets of communications, online documents, chat logs etc. to ensure that you have strong evidence when need arises. When this happens, the parties look at things objectively and can conduct investigations quite impartially without specifically relying on human assistance.

Conducting Employee Interviews: Techniques and Best Practices

Interviewing employees is the most delicate and difficult part of any investigation. You should ensure professionalism coupled with empathy and smart thinking. Some of the key interview questions should be prepared in advance after going through the evidence, documentation and accusation. Preparation is the key to ensure that the interview does not lose its objectivity.

Creating boundaries of respect and a comfortable environment is equally important. People open up more and provide a transparent and detailed narrative when they feel safe and respected.

Interviewers should listen and document notes, so that when it is time to review, they have ample data and information to work with to reach a fair decision.

Analysis, Findings, and Investigation Report Writing

Once the interviews are conducted, it is important to analyze the entire process, based on a clear analysis, you can draw evidence based findings. After this an investigation report should be drafted that should clearly and without going into too much detail, lay out the entire process, findings, responses and recommendations. It should involve time, chain of events, and all the evidence involved including witnesses.

Post-Investigation Actions: Disciplinary Measures, Remediation, and Prevention

Once the investigation is concluded, it should be followed up with some strong steps, normally involving disciplinary issues. If the findings suggest disciplinary issues then it may result in official warnings to termination of employment. Sometimes, the organization learns a lesson and revises their policies or procedural framework to ensure that something like that does not happen again. During this entire process it is important that communication is handled properly, prevention of similar events in future should be a priority. In conclusion, what determines that a workplace investigation is concluded successfully is to make sure that something like that does not happen again and people do not lose heart with your work environment and policies.